Also see:
- Censorship
- Clinical Trials
- D-Dimer Test
- De-population Agenda
- Dis-information
- Emergency Use Authorization
- Employer Mandated Vaccinations
- Hospital Protocol
- Informed Consent
- Isolated Virus
- Legal
- Legislation
- Mass Vaccinations
- Medical Tyranny
- Propaganda
- Pseudo-science
- Scientists and Others
- Statistics
- Studies
- T-Detect Test
- The Great Reset
- Vaccine Monitoring Systems
- Vaccine Performance
- Vaccine Safety
- Viral Variants
Summary
- PCR testing takes one molecule and amplifies it according to the number of cycles selected.
- It cannot be used to diagnose an active infection.
- It doesn’t tell you how much of something you have in you.
- e.g. everyone can have a molecule on Anthrax inside them and if you turn up the cycle setting sufficiently, you can falsely claim you’re infected with Anthrax.
- In order for a virus to infect you actively, you have to have a big enough culture of it to continually reproduce and infect cells.
- Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a lawyer who is legally fighting “PCR testing fraud” which generated all the fake “cases” used to justify lockdowns, masks, social distancing, limits on businesses, fines, jail time, and in Australia, full martial law.
- The FDA has revoked Emergency Use Authorization for PCR testing: CDC Quietly Revokes RT-PCR Emergency Use Authorization Because They Counted Covid-19 and Influenza Together
- source: 07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing
- Archived PDF: https://mymedicalfreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Lab-Alert_-Changes-to-CDC-RT-PCR-for-SARS-CoV-2-Testing.pdf
Even Dr. Fauci admits that high cycle counts amplify a small amount of material that is un-culturable (think how you culture bacteria on a petri dish).
This is how PCR cycles relate to a culturable amount of virus
Amplifying a tiny amount of virus gives a false positive because it’s still a tiny amount that you started off with. PCR can make it seem like there’s a lot because it amplifies. If you turn the cycle count high enough, you can find anything you want.
More Details
-
PCR Testing Equipment The PCR test was invented by Dr. Kary Mullis.
- It is a scientific research tool only. Dr. Mullis specifically mentioned that it cannot be used to diagnose active infections.
- A derivative PCR test was created by the German virologist Professor Dr. Christian Drosten, despite the inventor of the PCR test stating that the test should not be used in a clinical capacity.
- The PCR test for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus developed by Drosten in January 2020 at lightning speed is “the test of the year”! These test results are the legitimation for national governments worldwide to enforce the most massive restrictions of fundamental rights against citizens!
As recently as 2014, Drosten said of this PCR test method: “The method is so sensitive that it can detect a single hereditary molecule of this virus. If such a pathogen, for example, flits across a nurse’s nasal mucosa for a day without her getting sick or noticing anything else, she is suddenly a MERS case. Where previously, people at death’s door were reported, now mild cases and even people without symptoms are suddenly included in the reporting statistics. This could also explain the explosion in the number of cases in Saudi Arabia. On top of this, the local media have made an incredible fuss about it.”
-
A recent scientific research paper by 22 top-class scientists substantiates this suspicion, as they have refuted the scientific basis of the Drosten study, which served as the test protocol adopted by the WHO.
Also, initial court decisions have confirmed the unscientific nature of the Drosten study and his PCR test.
With his unscientific study and the unfit-for-purpose test based on it, this one man has significantly steered the entire Corona scenario: Christian Drosten – Not only he himself, but also the test he developed proves to be implausible upon close examination.
- Dr. Christian Drosten’s PCR test has been filled with controversy and deceit.
- Drosten: Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-PCR
PCR Cycles
The charts below were extracted from a scientific paper demonstrating the effects of higher cycle counts on detection. The cycle count is found on the X-axis of the chart. Notice how the range of 30-40 cycles creates an exponential increase in positive results.
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Dr. Fuellmich has uncovered several plots in Germany, and worldwide, to engineer the scientific establishment into several pro-vaccination narratives. He is currently engaged in litigation over this, as are many others in various countries.
“It is completely unscientific. It looks as though it was done in a sloppy way on purpose for the sole purpose of producing as many false positives as possible, all over the world, so that their agenda, which ends with the so-called vaccinations, which of course, we all know now, it doesn’t have anything to do with vaccinations. What we’re dealing with is genetic experiments.”
“The lockdowns are based on the same Drosten test – all of them! All of them! Because his test was recommended by the WHO, as the gold standard for the entire world, all the other PCR tests – there are about 300-500 in the meantime – they all use his test as a blueprint. Of course, all of them know that these tests cannot tell you anything about infections, but they’re all making a lot of money, so they don’t care. I’ve spoken with a couple of these PCR test makers. Of course they’re not going to admit it in public but at least behind closed doors, they admitted as much.”
“He (Drosten) claimed that there are asymptomatic infections, meaning people who show no symptoms whatsoever, which is normally: you’re healthy, they can be infectious. That was important for him to make everyone in the entire world afraid of everyone, no matter how healthy they looked.”
Lawsuit By America’s Frontline Doctors
America’s Frontline Doctors Lawsuit Part 1: The Big Lie
Then there’s the flawed polymerase chain reaction, or PCR, tests which are also experimental under an EUA and have artificially increased the number of overall cases. The lawsuit notes the manufacturers of the PCR tests include a disclaimer that the “FDA has not determined that the test is safe or effective for the detection of SARS-Co-V-2.”
“Manufacturer inserts furnished with PCR test products include disclaimers stating that the PCR tests should NOT be used to diagnose COVID-19. This is consistent with the warning issued by the Nobel Prize winning inventor of the PCR test that such tests are not appropriate for diagnosing disease,” the lawsuit states. Indeed, inventor Kary Mullis has warned about Anthony Fauci and his history of lying and fraudulent use of his PCR tests.
The lawsuit lists various quotes from Fauci showing he knows the PCR tests are fraudulently being used, and yet they are still used to this day. As it states: “The way in which the PCR tests are administered guaranties an unacceptably high number of false positive results.”
Good Video with Karry Mullis Discussing Medical Tyranny
Different Testing Methods Explained
PDF: https://mymedicalfreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/COVID19-TestingExplained.pdf
COVID19-TestingExplained
June 7, 2023
May 30, 2023
May 21, 2023
November 13, 2022
October 26, 2022
October 20, 2022
September 20, 2022
July 27, 2022
July 12, 2022
May 18, 2022