Lockdowns

Share to the world...

back to Topics

Also see:

Lockdown Data

  • source:  COVID-19 lockdowns caused more deaths instead of reducing them, study finds
  • RAND Corporation + two researchers from the University of Southern California.
  • Did analysis of the medical value of the lockdowns (which they refer to as “sheltering in place,” or SIP, policies).
  • Looked at 43 countries and all of the states in the union (June, working paper of the National Bureau for Economic Research).

  • [W]e fail to find that SIP policies saved lives. To the contrary, we find a positive association between SIP policies and excess deaths. We find that following the implementation of SIP policies, excess mortality increases.

  • If SIP were implemented when excess deaths were rising then the results … would be biased towards finding that SIP policies lead to excess deaths. However, we find the opposite: countries that implemented SIP policies experienced a decline in excess mortality prior to implementation compared to countries that did not implement SIP policies.

  • We failed to find that countries or U.S. states that implemented SIP policies earlier, and in which SIP policies had longer to operate, had lower excess deaths than countries/U.S. states that were slower to implement SIP policies.

Reiner Fuellmich

“It is completely unscientific.  It looks as though it was done in a sloppy way on purpose for the sole purpose of producing as many false positives as possible, all over the world, so that their agenda, which ends with the so-called vaccinations, which of course, we all know now, it doesn’t have anything to do with vaccinations. What we’re dealing with is genetic experiments.”

“[su_highlight background=”#feff28”]The lockdowns are based on the same Drosten test – all of them! All of them! Because his test was recommended by the WHO, as the gold standard for the entire world, all the other PCR tests – there are about 300-500 in the meantime – they all use his test as a blueprint.[/su_highlight]Of course, all of them know that these tests cannot tell you anything about infections, but they’re all making a lot of money, so they don’t care. I’ve spoken with a couple of these PCR test makers. Of course they’re not going to admit it in public but at least behind closed doors, they admitted as much.”

“He (Drosten) claimed that there are asymptomatic infections, meaning people who show no symptoms whatsoever, which is normally: you’re healthy, they can be infectious. That was important for him to make everyone in the entire world afraid of everyone, no matter how healthy they looked.”

[su_pullquote]But we have [su_highlight background=”#feff28″]two decisions by courts of law[/su_highlight] that say that this [su_highlight background=”#feff28″]Drosten test doesn’t even come close to telling you anything about infections[/su_highlight]. The first decision is about four or five, six months old. It was a decision by a [su_highlight background=”#feff28″]Portuguese appellate court which held that these Drosten PCR tests can’t tell you anything about infections[/su_highlight]. And the second decision is only two days old. We got it two days ago, I think, [su_highlight background=”#feff28″]from a Vienna court. And it again holds very clearly that these tests cannot tell you anything about infections[/su_highlight].[/su_pullquote]

Lockdowns articles

Restrictions articles


Share to the world...