TGP reported in 2020 that the WHO was not correct in its projections that the China coronavirus (COVID-19) had a mortality rate of 3.4% compared to the flu having a rate of 0.06%. We were proven right.
The WHO has a group of entities and websites that it uses to push its agenda and propaganda. The group of 101 websites, Vaccine Safety Net is one of the WHO’s propaganda-pushing groups. The VSN was established by the WHO.
The Vaccine Safety Net has 101 member websites and one of those websites is Health Feedback. This website addresses information that it and the WHO doesn’t like. The website is part of the VSN and is therefore connected to the WHO.
This past week, Health Feedback published a hit piece on Dr. Li Meng Yan and The Gateway Pundit. In our article, we reported that COVID-19 was created in a laboratory in China and Dr. Li claimed that COVID-19 was intentionally released by China.
The French site in its biased report claims that it reached out to Dr. Li-Meng Yan but according to Dr. Yan, this is not the case. She has never heard from this organization.
The main claim that COVID-19 was not developed in a lab is pure China propaganda. China has an incentive to make this claim. Once it is determined that COVID-19 was developed in a lab, then China becomes liable for the death and economic devastation that occurred around the world from COVID-19. Therefore, China is doing all it can to prevent this reporting and related evidence from being reported. China does this by using the WHO and those entities connected to the WHO. This is really a sinister enterprise.
No evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered in a laboratory, contrary to claim by Li-Meng Yan - Health Feedback
Also, the reporter of this piece attacking The Gateway Pundit and Dr. Yan, is Flora Teoh, who is no stranger to us. We reported on her previously. She was involved in flagging information from doctors in California that suggested only the sick and immuno-compromised individuals must be quarantined, not healthy people. Ms. Teoh is not a doctor but here she goes again, pretending to be smarter about the subject matter expert who worked in the Chinese labs whom she criticizes.