Pfizer is Seeking Full Indemnification, Twisted Authorization Letter, Legal Cover for Mask Mandates

Share to the world...

FDA Approval

  • 2 distinct letters
    • Pfizer
    • BioNTech
  • Authorization is for BioNTech.
    • Initiated only when product becomes available.
  • Pfizer still under EUA (has legal immunity).
  • Dr. Robert Malone: Suggest you hold off for BioNTech
    • Will not have liability protection the same as the Pfizer product
  • BioNTech FDA Authorization was rushed without following precedent.
    • This is “conditional” approval only (based on remaining studies).
    • External advisory committee has been bypassed.
    • Public comment has been bypassed.
    • FDA says it has “no concerns”.
  • Malone:
    • FDA does not have safety and efficacy concerns.
    • Efficacy data cites only original COVID virus strains, not Delta, or other strains.
    • FDA/CDC hiding data.
  • Child Vaccinations
    • Risk of COVID in pediatric cohert is basically non-existent.
    • Pfizer
      • Not for < 16 yrs old.
    • BioNTech is authorized for ≥ 16 yrs old only.
      • The conditional FDA approval may be used to get Emergency Use Authorization for < 16 yrs old.
        • They will disregard studies (that are negative).
    • No data on safety of pregnancy.
    • Some studies still to be accomplished 2023-2024.
  • Malone:  Thinks this authorization is to give the government and corporations cover for vaccine mandates.
    • They did this because they knew it violates bioethics.
    • They are invalidating VAERS (and the 20 other different databases) by saying it is inadequate.
  • This authorization is for a vaccine that is not available.
    • There are 2 separate letters for 2 vaccines.
      • Pfizer is under EUA and is under liability shield.
      • BioNTech product (Comernity) is NOT YET AVAILABLE.
        • Has no liability waiver.

Share to the world...